Cpgm 7356.021 drug quality reporting system (dqrs); medwatch reports); nda field alert reports (fars)

CHAPTER 56 – Drug Quality Assurance
Drug Quality Reporting System (DQRS) (MedWatch Reports);
DQRS (MedWatch Reports):
Districts must complete, in a timely manner, their investigations and follow-up to those DQRS
(MedWatch) reports, furnished by the Drug Surveillance and Data Reporting Branch (DSDRB,
formerly within the Division of Compliance Risk Management and Surveillance (DCRMS)), that
have significant product quality defects (i.e. suspect counterfeits, product contamination, poor
packaging, product mix-up, labeling concerns, therapeutic failures). Send an e-mail notification
to CDER DQRS Reports. For non-violative inspections generated under this program, when the
Establishment Inspection Report is completed in Turbo EIR to the Office of Manufacturing and
Product Quality (OMPQ), DSDRB. For all violative inspections, documentation should be
submitted in MARCS-CMS in accordance with the Regulatory Procedures Manual (RPM).
NDA FARs (New Drug Application Field Alert Reports:
The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, section 505(k) requires New Drug Application (NDA) holders to provide a Field Alert Report, on distributed drug product, to the Agency with any information concerning any incident that causes the drug product or its labeling to be mistaken for, or applied to another article, as well as information concerning any bacteriological contamination, significant chemical or physical changes, product deterioration, or failure of one or more distributed drug product batches to meet their respective specifications. Notify DSDRB when Establishment Inspection Reports (EIRs) are completed in Turbo EIR and send NDA-FARs received from manufacturers under 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1); and 21 CFR 314.98(c) for Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) to DSDRB by e-mail ([email protected]) within five working days of district receipt. For all violative inspections, documentation should be submitted in MARCS-CMS in accordance with the Regulatory Procedures Manual. PART I - BACKGROUND
DQRS (MedWatch Reports):

The MedWatch program plays a vital role in the post marketing phase of regulating all
pharmaceutical products. It has a twofold purpose: 1) to rapidly identify significant health
hazards associated with the manufacturing and packaging of pharmaceuticals, and 2) to establish
a central reporting system for capturing and identifying drug quality problem areas or trends that
may require regulatory action.

Since the early 1970's, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has operated a voluntary
program specifically directed to health care professionals for the reporting of observed or
suspected defects and problems associated with finished drug product in the pharmaceutical
supply chain.
Over the years the name of the program has changed. From 1988 to 1993, the program was
called the “Drug Quality Reporting System (DQRS)” and the form used for reporting was DQRS
Form 3318.
In June 1993, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced the MedWatch reporting
program. It was designed to simplify reporting to FDA by means of consolidating several FDA
reporting programs involving drugs, biologics, devices, and medical foods through the use of a
single reporting form (FDA 3500/3500A ) (Attachment Part VI B ) and a toll free telephone/fax
number. Although the MedWatch form replaced the DQRS Form 3318, it did not replace the
DQRS system and offices in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) that are
responsible for evaluating and processing drug quality problems reported to FDA. FDA Form
3500 is used for voluntary reporting by both healthcare professionals and consumers and is the
subject of the DQRS program.
Important Note: FDA Form 3500A is used for mandatory reporting of adverse drug events
(e.g.15 day reports for adverse event reporting covered by 21 CFR 314.80) by application
holders and is not the subject of the DQRS program. See Compliance Program 7353.001
Postmarketing Surveillance (PMS) and Epidemiology: Human Drugs -Adverse Drug Effects.
These reports can be submitted by toll free telephone (1-800-FDA-1088), fax number (1-800-
FDA-0178), internet or mail.
FDA currently employs a contractor to operate the MedWatch contract. The contractor receives
all MedWatch reports, sends an acknowledgement letter to the reporter and distributes the
reports to the various centers according to the product/problem on the report. All reports
received concerning drug quality problems are forwarded to the Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (CDER), Office of Compliance (OC), Office of Manufacturing and Product
Quality (OMPQ), Drug Surveillance and Data Reporting Branch (DSDRB).

DSDRB is responsible for the review and evaluation of all such drug quality reports, the issuance
of prioritized assignments, the monitoring of their status and the review of all DQRS related
EIRs and laboratory worksheets. In addition DSDRB conducts trend analyses, and serves as a
contact point for field inquiries regarding assignments, and any questions regarding reports from
the DQRS data base.
The disclosure section in the FDA MedWatch Form 3500/3500A is of particular importance. If
the reporter indicates their preference for anonymity by checking the do not disclose box, then
FDA must comply and not disclose the identity of the reporter to the manufacturer.
B. NDA Field Alert Reports (FARs)

The NDA/ANDA Field Alert reporting requirements, 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)(i) and (ii), became
effective on May 23, 1985. The regulation requires holders of NDAs and ANDAs “to submit
certain information about distributed drug products” to the jurisdictional FDA district offices
within three working days. The 3 working days begins when the applicant becomes aware of a
reported problem through either a complaint or internal testing. It does not begin the day the
applicant confirms or invalidates a problem. FARs may be reported via telephone or other means
of rapid communication with prompt written follow-up. The FAR and its mailing cover should
be plainly marked: “NDA-Field Alert Report”. Form FDA 3331 (References Part VI A)
provides a standardized form for applicants to report.
FARs, in contrast to the "postmarketing reporting of adverse drug experiences" covered by 21
CFR § 314.80, contains a variety of drug quality issues and are of interest to both field and
CDER offices.
Quality defect problems reported in FARs involve violative issues and concerns that pose a
potential health hazard to the public. These problems include, but are not limited to, matters
concerning dissolution failures, impurity levels, mislabeling and sub/super potency of distributed
drug products and articles. If the applicant holder can invalidate the problem (e.g. problem was
due to an analytical laboratory error) within 3 working days, a FAR is not required. For guidance
on investigating out of specification (OOS) test results, see Investigating Out-of-Specification
Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production
. If the applicant holder determines that further
investigation is required or a corrective action is initiated (e.g. formulation revision, labeling
change, etc.), a FAR must be submitted.
Criteria for when a FAR must be submitted by the NDA/ANDA holder include but are not
limited to:

Any incident that causes the drug product or its labeling to be mistaken for, or applied to, another article Significant chemical, physical or other changes Failure of one or more distributed batches of drug products to meet the specification established in the application.
Foreign NDA/ANDA holders must follow the same criteria for FAR reporting (as used for
domestic sites) for drug products manufactured overseas according to the specifications of an
NDA/ANDA and/or distributed in foreign markets. Foreign application holders are required to
have a U.S. Office/Agent (21 CFR 314.50(a)(5) who is responsible for reporting to the FDA. The
U.S. agent shall follow the same guidelines for FAR submission, reporting within 3 working
days to the jurisdictional district office where a problem occurred. In the case of an involved
foreign facility, the U.S. agent shall submit the FAR to the district office where the U.S. agent is
DSDRB is the CDER focal point to receive, evaluate, and forward FAR reports to the
appropriate CDER review divisions and other headquarters offices for follow-up and further
evaluation. FARs are entered into the DQRS database for tracking and trending purposes.
C. Miscellaneous Reports

Certain selected reports of suspected product problems received at headquarters from various
external sources (consumers, trade, professional, etc.) are being routed to DSDRB for evaluation
and may be included under this compliance program.
Reports which clearly do not fall under the purview of this program, i.e. veterinary products, are
forwarded to the appropriate FDA units for their evaluation and follow-up. Reports involving
food products or supplements and vitamins are referred to the jurisdictional district office for
their information, and a copy of the report is provided to CFSAN. Reports involving biological
products (which are not under CDER regulatory authority) or medical devices are provided to
To reduce public health risk by quickly identifying drug quality defects in the market place which may require corrective action. • Assure the timely evaluation of drug quality defect reports -- NDA Field Alert and • Provide guidance to the field for processing and handling FAR, and DQRS reports. • Provide guidance to the field regarding FAR and DQRS follow-up and for-cause PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS

DQRS (MedWatch Reports):

DSDRB will issue assignments to the appropriate district by e-mail to obtain specific
information about a reported problem. An information copy of the assignment will be sent to the
analyzing laboratory when it is identified.
A computer generated report (in lieu of a copy of the original report e.g. a MedWatch report) is
forwarded with the assignment, to the district offices. The computer generated DQRS report
contains all of the information reported on the original MedWatch form, except for the reporting
person’s signature. Some reports will require immediate attention, e.g. suspected imminent
health hazard.
Following the review and evaluation process of DQRS Reports, DSDRB, assigns a priority
classification for follow-up investigation by the responsible district office. The priority
classification (P1, P2, P3) are listed below. All DQRS and miscellaneous reports are given a
priority code, defect classification code and an MSB file reference number. MSB refers to the
Manufacturing Surveillance Branch (MSB) which no longer exists. However, the use of “MSB”
continues. The MSB file reference number consists of the last two digits of the fiscal year
followed by a sequential number, e.g. 11-02046. The priority codes are assigned as follows.
DQRS reports that require immediate attention such as a death report (P1) or suspected imminent
hazard will be communicated to the District Director or the Director, Investigations Branch.
DQRS Priority classification codes are assigned as follows:
a.) Priority 1 (P1) reports are defined as imminent or serious health hazards, or significant
violations of current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP). Inspections or follow-up for P1s have a target completion date not to exceed 15 calendar days. Serious health hazards include (but not limited to): • A death has or possibly could occur if the drug is used • The product could cause harm to the patient this includes but is not limited to products that may cause serious harm due to super-potency, sub-potency, dissolution, labeling and/or packaging errors • Serious CGMP violations exist that could represent a risk to the public, if left uncorrected (e.g. possible product contamination, incorrect container). b.) Priority 2 (P2) reports are defined as significant CGMP violations that do not represent
a potential health hazard. P2 reports require inspectional follow-up or evaluation within 60 days • Reported quality defects are potentially significant CGMP problems that do not c.) Priority 3 (P3) reports are defined as follows:
• Problem appears to be isolated, or of a cosmetic nature that does not involve a potential health hazard, or any significant violations, e.g. broken container, shortage of tablets or capsules in a container, faded tablets, container label print quality, or corrective actions have already been taken by the firm. • P3 reports require follow-up by the appropriate district at the next regularly
NDA Field Alert Reports (FARs)
Since Field Alert Reports are initially submitted to the district office, these reports do not receive
priority codes. FDA Forms 3331 are sent from the district to the cderdqrsreports mailbox for
evaluation and follow-up, along with any district recommendations, and Health Hazard
Evaluations from the firm. When additional information regarding FARs is needed, DSDRB
will contact the appropriate district office for additional investigation and inspectional follow-up.
This compliance program does NOT include instructions for drug quality complaints received
directly by the district offices from consumers (consumer complaints), health professionals, etc.
The districts should process and act upon those reports in accordance with established quality
management systems and procedures within their organizational entities.
To designate a Drug Defect Reporting Monitor or Drug Field Alert Monitor who is responsible for either the DQRS program, FAR program, or both programs in order to maintain continuity in these programs. It is recommended that each district establish and maintain a district DQRS/FAR e-mail mailbox account for receipt of DQRS and FAR reports and related correspondence from DSDRB.
DQRS (MedWatch Reports):

DSDRB prioritizes DQRS reports of product quality defects and sends the reports by e-mail to
the districts for further evaluation and inspectional follow-up based on the priority (see above
Part II B. a.b.c.). The district should notify DSDRB (any information, such as a recent inspection, that could change the initial priority classification
assigned by DSDRB.
Districts should notify DSDRB if a DQRS report is received for a manufacturer that is not located in their jurisdiction by returning the DQRS report to DSDRB through the mailbox or forwarding the report to the appropriate district and copying the cderdqrsreports mailbox. District should: 1. Contact DSDRB by e-mail (concerning any drug quality complaints received directly by the district from health care professionals and consumers. 2. Account for the receipt and disposition of all DQRS assignments with their respective DQRS report and exhibits received from DSDRB. 3. Keep DSDRB informed of the status of P1 and P2 DQRS assignments by communicating when an assignment is completed. Forward any new relevant information concerning the DQRS report to DSDRB. This can be done via the mail box and copying the initiator of the assignment. Any communication should include the MSB number assigned to the DQRS report. 4. Forward a copy of any follow-up DQRS investigations and summaries of analytical findings to DSDRB for evaluation and inclusion into the DQRS database. NDA Field Alert Reports:
1. The district coordinator is encouraged to set up a DQRS/FARs e-mail box dedicated to receiving field alert reports from the firms in their district. Firms should be instructed to send all FARs to this one mailbox. This would eliminate FARS going to other areas in the district office e.g. to the recall coordinator. 2. It is recommended that the district coordinator is to serve as the district’s contact point to facilitate communications with an applicant holder on matters pertaining to the status of a field alert (i.e. initial and final status of FAR or FDA Form 3331) and with DSDRB. 3. Send each FAR (initial, follow-up and final) to CDER DQRS Reports within five
working days after receipt from the firm.
4. Contact applicants, if necessary, to obtain additional information to include any CAPAs, and request a time line for initiating or completing their investigation. 5. Perform assessments of all FARs (initial, follow-up, and final) and provide them to CDER DQRS Reports. For the assessments, determine if the firm's root cause analysis and corrective and preventive actions, as stated on the FARs and any subsequent District follow-up, are adequate to mitigate risk, and comply with FDA regulations. 6. For districts dealing with a U.S. agent submitted FAR, please submit the FAR to the ail box with a copy to DFFI. On an as needed basis instruct U.S. agents in your district about the proper method for submission of FARs involving foreign facilities. (See NOTE Part I C.) PART III – INSPECTIONAL
DQRS (MedWatch Reports):
Investigations should determine the validity of the problem reported and it may include a CGMP inspection based on the investigator’s findings. Unless otherwise instructed in the assignment, follow-up inspections for DQRS reports should collect the following information: • Validity and extent of the reported problem • Product(s) (including lot numbers) affected • Management’s knowledge of and response to the problem prior to the investigation* • Root cause(s) of problem(s) • Action(s) taken by management to correct the problem • Corrective action and preventive action plans (CAPA) * DSDRB furnishes a computer-generated report along with a letter to the manufacturer/marketer of the product(s) identified in the DQRS report (except when a report indicates a product is injudicious, e.g., fraudulent, counterfeit, etc.). The letter includes the MSB file reference number of the DQRS report and a statement that FDA considers the report as part of their complaint file under 21 CFR 211.198, and the report might also fall under the manufacturer’s reporting obligations under 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1).
NDA Field Alert Reports
1. Districts must ensure that applicant holders are submitting FARs as required by 21 CFR 2. As part of the district’s preparation for inspections, review any FARS (and relevant DQRS reports) to be covered while on inspection. Two weeks prior to the inspection, the district should request through CDER DQRS Reports the FAR history associated for a specified firm and drug product from DSDRB. 3. For investigations which involve Out of Specification results for finished marketed products, the district should ask if the firm submitted any FARs to the Agency. 4. For FARs that affect more than one product, firms should submit one FAR per NDA/ANDA of distributed product. Multiple lots of the same product may be submitted on one form. 5. When reviewing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) during inspections, note the firm’s handling and reporting of NDA FARs to ensure their compliance with 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)(i) and (ii). 6. Failure of a firm to submit an NDA/ANDA FAR for distributed violative product is 7. Investigators, in conjunction with Field Alert Monitors, should attempt to determine if the firm’s root cause analysis, as stated in any FAR has been thoroughly investigated. The firm’s investigation shall extend to other batches of the same drug product and other drug products that may have been associated with the specific failure or discrepancy. They should also determine if the corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) are adequate to mitigate risk. PART IV - ANALYTICAL
Analytical chemical and microbial sample analysis in the NDA FAR and DQRS report under 7356.021A/B programs may be requested on an ad hoc basis. All sampling and collection assignments should be entered into FACTS. ANALYZING LABORATORIES
ORA Field Laboratories are designated to conduct regulatory sample analysis under 7356.021A/B. When samples are sent to the ORA Field Labs for analysis, the investigator should communicate with the Division of Field Science prior to sample collection as well as to the Field laboratory to determine the exact sample size needed for analysis. The following laboratories have been provided for: Chemical Testing Laboratories: NRL, PHI-DO, SRL, SJN-DO DET-DO, PRL- General Microbiology: NRL, SRL, PRL-SW, SAN-DO and DEN-DO Nutrient Testing: Atlanta Center Nutrient Analysis (ACNA) Office of Pharmaceutical Science, Office of Testing and Research, Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis , 1114 Market Street, Room 2001, St. Louis, MO 63101 Methodology
Drug samples will be analyzed as regulatory samples for drug quality or microbial contamination by either the USP methodology or by the (NDA/ANDA) firm’s method if it is more stability indicating. Specified methodology used in analysis will depend on factors, such as limit of detection, limit of quantitation, as well as the specificity and nature of the problem for which the product is being tested. For questions about methodology or which tests to conduct, contact Office of Regional Operations, the Division of Field Science or the CDER/OC/DPCDO/Drug Surveillance and Data Reporting Branch. Sample Collections
DSDRB will issue an ad hoc sample assignment in FACTS to the districts to collect samples for testing under 56021A DQRS Reports or 56021 B for NDA Field Alerts. Sample sizes will depend upon the nature of the product to be analyzed and the tests selected for analyses. For questions on specific sample sizes, the districts should contact the appropriate ORA servicing laboratory. (See the IOM chapter 4.1.4 and 21 CFR 2.10 for additional information on official samples) D. Reporting Instructions
Samples collected under NDA Field Alert should be reported under 56021A for DQRS and 56021B NDA FARs. Ad hoc samples are to be entered into FACTS and flagged with the appropriate MSB file reference number. All worksheets generated by this program should be routed through your supervisor. A copy of the sample summary and worksheets should be forwarded to DSDRB . PART V - REGULATORY/ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGY
Unless an inspection results in the documentation of an egregious high risk violation where the agency was not notified of the incident as required by the regulations, generally an advisory action would be the first choice of regulatory action for violations covered under this compliance program. However, it is recommended that for NDA/ANDA FAR, significant violations (under or lack of reporting) should be included in recommendations for advisory actions due to other violations of the Act (CGMP, ADE, or unapproved drugs) and should be sent in MARC-CMS to CDER’S OMPQ Division of Domestic Drug Quality. Consult additional compliance programs related to the violation in determining if a regulatory action is appropriate. The following NDA/ANDA Field Alert Reporting violations should be considered for inclusion in a CGMP, ADE, or other recommendation for an advisory action: The following citations should be used for violations related to this Compliance Program: a) In cases where the evidence relates to a labeling violation: Failure to submit an NDA Field Alert Report in compliance with 21 C.F.R. 314.81(b)(1)(i). Applicants must submit information about distributed products within three days of learning about any incident that causes the drug product or its labeling to be mistaken for, or applied to another article. b) In cases where the evidence relates to any bacteriological contamination, or any significant chemical, physical, or other change in distributed product, or any failure to meet specifications: Failure to submit an NDA Field Alert Report in compliance with 21 C.F.R. 314.81(b)(ii). Applicants must submit information about distributed products within three days of learning about bacteriological contamination, or any significant chemical, physical, or other change or deterioration in the distributed drug product, or any failure of one or more distributed batches of drug product to meet the specifications established for it in the application. Under 21 CFR 314.50(a)(5), the applicant’s attorney, US Agent, or authorized official must submit an NDA FAR for their client (applicant), who is importing to the United States, to the District Office where the Corporate Headquarters is situated. PART VI - REFERENCES, ATTACHMENTS, AND PROGRAM CONTACTS
NDA Field Alert Reporting – 21 CFR 314.81(b)(1)(i) and (ii) ANDA Field Alert Reporting – 21 CFR 314.98(c) FDA Form 3331 – New Drug Application Field Alert Report Investigating Out-of-Specification Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production Office of Regional Operations
• Division of Domestic Field Investigations (DDFI) • Division of Foreign Field Investigations (DFFI) General Chemistry: Ian (Paul) Mayers -Telephone: (301) 827-3804 Sterility: Jennifer Letts: Telephone (301) 827-3804 Norma Duran – General Microbiology (301) 796-6133 CDER Office of Compliance/Office of Manufacturing and Product Quality (OMPQ) Division of Policy, Collaboration and Data Operations Drug Surveillance and Data Reporting Branch (OC/OMPQ/DPCDO/DSDRB) PART VII - CENTER RESPONSIBILITIES

DQRS (MedWatch Reports):
The Office of Compliance, Office of Manufacturing and Product Quality (OMPQ), Division of
Policy Collaboration and Data Operations (DPCDO), Drug Surveillance and Data Reporting
Branch (DSDRB) will:
1. Receive, evaluate and code DQRS Reports for significant product quality defects and provide them to the Field for further evaluation and inspectional follow-up. 2. Issue an e-mail and FACTS assignment along with the DQRS report, to the district offices. Upon request from the district, CDER will issue a computer generated report containing all of the information reported on the original MedWatch form except for the reporter’s signature. 3. Provide assurance that assignments will contain sufficient data for the field to evaluate the nature and extent of the problem/product being investigated; monitor the status of all assignments; and serve as a point of contact for field inquiries. 4. Request e-mail updates and phone numbers of DQRS coordinators for each district and their designated alternate's emails and phone numbers on an annual basis. 5. Notify Division of Domestic Field Investigations (DDFI) District Directors (DD) and the Directors of Investigations Branch (DIBs) of DQRS Reports that require immediate attention, such as a death report (P1) or suspected imminent hazard.
NDA Field Alert Reports:
1. When requested, DSDRB will provide district offices with a summary listing of NDA/ANDA FAR reports of specific manufacturers and drug products to facilitate the drug inspection process. 2. Collaborate with ORA headquarters and district offices on Field Alert investigations and 3. Prepare and issue sampling assignment in FACTS (for ad hoc or directed samples). 4. Work with the ORA Field, Headquarters, district offices, and different FDA Centers to facilitate resolution of product quality defect issues. Note: For both Field Alert Reports and DQRS DSDRB will notify the district if it is determined that a directed or for cause inspection assignment is warranted.

Source: http://progovhub.net/PDF/FinalCPGM%207356%20021.pdf

Attenuation of ssri-induced increases in extracellular brain 5-ht by benzodiazepines

Attenuation of SSRI-induced increases in extracellular brain 5-HT by benzodiazepines Chapter 8 Attenuation of SSRI-induced increases in extracellular brain 5-HT by benzodiazepines. Abstract Enhanced serotonergic neurotransmission is generally thought to be the neurochemical basisof the antidepressant effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). The anxiolytic benzodiaz

Microsoft word - jan 16.doc

January 16 - 22 Volume 4, Issue 20 Contents: Highlighted Article| Recipe of the Week| Article 2| Humor 9 Reasons Your Body (Mistakenly) Thinks It’s Hungry – Brynn Mannino, Woman’s Day "Getting eight hours of sleep a night 2. You're taking medication that causes hunger as a side effect. If 4. It's "mealtime." As creatures of Stokes, R

Copyright © 2008-2018 All About Drugs